Trauma Misread as Instability: How Family Courts Are Failing Survivors of Abuse

---

Victims of coercive control and post-separation abuse are being punished for the very trauma their abusers caused.

Courts must stop weaponising mental health and listen to the voices of children and survivors.

When Family Courts Misread Trauma: How Survivors of Domestic Abuse Are Being Failed

“I was told that I was unstable in court. My child’s fear was twisted into evidence against me. Meanwhile, he smiled and said nothing, suddenly he was the credible parent.”

These are the words of a survivor who fled years of coercive control, financial abuse, and psychological intimidation. She left everything behind, home, savings, sense of safety to protect her child. And yet, in the family courtroom, her trauma was treated as a flaw. Her honesty, her bluntness, her visible distress: all used against her.

The piece exposes a growing problem in UK family courts: survivors of domestic abuse, coercive control, and post-separation abuse are often retraumatised by legal proceedings. Trauma, fear, anxiety, depression, visible distress, is misinterpreted as instability, while abusers who present calmly are assumed credible.

Children’s protective responses are sometimes framed as “parental alienation,” a term not recognised in major diagnostic manuals but increasingly used in court to discredit protective parents.

Drawing on UK law (the Serious Crime Act 2015, Domestic Abuse Act 2021), Practice Direction 12J, and CPS/CAFCASS guidance, the article argues for trauma-informed practice, recognition of coercive control, and prioritisation of child safety. It combines survivor testimony, legal references, and practical recommendations for reform.

Abuse Is About Power, Not Instability

The law recognises that coercive control, psychological manipulation, financial domination, threats, and isolation, is a criminal offence.

The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 goes further, recognising that children who see, hear, or experience abuse are victims in their own right.

Yet in family court, patterns of abuse are often overlooked. Courts are presented with isolated claims about a survivor’s emotional distress, interpreted as instability or manipulativeness. Trauma becomes evidence against the very person trying to protect themselves and their children.

The Weaponisation of “Parental Alienation”

A particularly damaging tactic is the sudden accusation of “parental alienation.” Abusers claim, “I feel the children are being alienated from me,” shifting attention away from their own coercive behaviour.

But children who resist contact with an abusive parent are often responding to fear or harm. Their reactions are protective, not manipulative.

The term “parental alienation” is not recognised in major diagnostic manuals such as the World Health Organization’s ICD or the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM. And yet in courts, it is sometimes treated as though it were a clinical condition, effectively silencing survivors and children.

Courts must ask the right question first: What has the child experienced?

Neurodivergent Survivors Face Extra Barriers

Autistic and ADHD survivors face further hurdles.

Direct communication, emotional honesty, and visible distress can be misinterpreted as aggression or instability, while abusers who present calmly are seen as credible.

This systemic bias unfairly penalises honesty and trauma responses, rather than examining the patterns of abuse that caused them.

Post-Separation Abuse: When the Courts Become a Tool of Control

Leaving an abusive relationship is often just the beginning.

Many survivors experience post-separation abuse, in which abusers continue coercive behaviour through repeated court applications, false allegations, and manipulation of child arrangements.

Family courts that fail to recognise these patterns risk becoming a continuation of the very control survivors are trying to escape.

Trauma Is Evidence of Abuse, Not Instability

Domestic abuse causes trauma, anxiety, depression, fear.

These responses are not evidence of instability; they are evidence of survival.

Police, prosecutors, CAFCASS officers, social workers, and family courts must distinguish cause from effect.

Trauma is a sign that abuse occurred, not proof that a survivor is unfit to parent.

Recognising Strength

Every day, survivors rebuild their lives while protecting their children.

They work long hours, sacrifice meals, and navigate complex legal systems with trauma on their shoulders. These parents are not unstable, they are resilient.

Their courage deserves support, not punishment.

Time for Change

The law recognises coercive control and post-separation abuse. And yet implementation lags behind reality.

Family courts must:-

• Recognise patterns of coercive and controlling behaviour

• Understand trauma-informed practice

• Prevent the weaponisation of mental health narratives

• Identify post-separation abuse

• Prioritise children’s lived experiences and safety

Abuse thrives in misunderstanding.

Justice begins with recognising the truth: trauma is not the problem, the abuse that caused it is.

Author Bio / Call to Action

Deanna Newell is a domestic abuse advocate and researcher focused on family justice reform. She works with survivors, legal professionals, and policymakers to improve understanding of domestic abuse, including coercive control, financial abuse, economic abuse, post-separation abuse, child maintenance reform, and trauma-informed family court practice.

Survivors and their children deserve systems that protect rather than retraumatise.

---

Deanna Newell Family Law

Advocacy for truth-tellers, survivors, and the children who deserve better