Legal Systems Overwhelmed by Misuse of Parental Alienation Allegations in Domestic Abuse and Coercive Control Cases
- Deanna Newell
- Jun 14
- 3 min read
Updated: Jun 25

False allegations of parental alienation—increasingly used to deflect from genuine concerns about domestic abuse, coercive control, and financial or economic abuse—are placing an unsustainable burden on the family court system.
A particularly concerning trend is the rise of “financial alienation,” where one parent manipulates legal processes not to protect a child’s welfare, but to secure financial advantage. This often coincides with attempts to avoid child maintenance or shift the economic balance of power during separation.
Against the backdrop of a post-pandemic economy, rising living costs, and widespread financial instability, these tactics are more prevalent—and more damaging—than ever.
The Hidden Cost to Families and the Justice System
When false alienation claims are weaponised:
Genuine safeguarding concerns may be dismissed.
Vulnerable children can be left in unsafe environments.
Police and social services are pulled into unnecessary interventions.
Court resources are stretched, delaying justice for families in crisis.
At its worst, this misuse traumatises victims, erodes public trust, and undermines the integrity of the entire family justice system.
Promoting Healthy Co-Parenting Over Legal Combat
A healthier first step is to promote child-focused, cooperative parenting. Not all post-separation conflict requires courtroom intervention.
We need to prioritise:
Evidence-based parenting programmes
Early intervention and mediation
Services that equip parents to resolve disputes without escalating conflict
These tools help reframe separation around children’s emotional wellbeing, not adult grievances or financial scorekeeping.
Reforming the Legal Framework
To meet this growing crisis, the family court system must be equipped to accurately distinguish genuine abuse from manipulative legal tactics. Key reforms should include:
Mandatory training for judges, magistrates, CAFCASS officers, and legal professionals in coercive control, post-separation abuse, and the misuse of alienation claims
A move from the subjective “balance of probabilities” to a more forensic, evidence-based model—especially in cases with serious safeguarding concerns
Independent psychological assessments and holistic family welfare evaluations
Accountability measures for parties who deliberately mislead the court, including cost orders, sanctions, or changes to contact and financial arrangements
Addressing Financial Motives and Economic Abuse
When courts find that false allegations have been made to gain financial advantage, this behaviour should be formally recognised as economic abuse under the umbrella of coercive control.
Courts should have powers to:
Reassess child maintenance, ensuring fair and equitable support for children
Impose financial consequences if litigation was prolonged unnecessarily or the other party incurred substantial legal costs defending false claims
Such consequences would act as a deterrent and help preserve court time and resources for families genuinely in need.
The Wider Impact on Society
The weaponisation of parental alienation is not just a private issue. It’s a systemic crisis with far-reaching consequences:
It diverts police and social services from real safeguarding threats
It burdens mental health teams dealing with traumatised children and parents
It risks failing the very children it claims to protect
The Call to Action
To restore trust in the family justice system and safeguard vulnerable children, we must:
Demand truth and transparency in legal proceedings
Recognise the misuse of parental alienation as a systemic issue
Support reforms that protect both justice and the best interests of children
Only through evidence-based practice, legal accountability, and trauma-informed compassion can we begin to rebuild a family court system that truly protects the vulnerable.
Family Courts in Crisis
False parental alienation claims are flooding the system—often used to deflect from abuse or manipulate child maintenance. This misuse delays justice, harms children, and wastes vital resources.
We need:
Mandatory training on coercive control
Independent psychological assessments
Accountability for false allegations
Recognition of financial alienation as economic abuse
Let’s reform the system to protect the children — and families — who need it most.
Deanna Newell Family Law
Advocacy for truth-tellers, survivors, and the children who deserve better



Comments