top of page
Search

Financial Gain: A Hidden Form of Abuse

  • Deanna Newell
  • Jun 26
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jul 6

ree

What Do We Mean by “Financial Gain” in Parental Alienation?


There’s a familiar pattern.


One parent leaves the relationship—often to escape emotional harm, reclaim their wellbeing, or protect the children. They may offer a fair divorce settlement, a mortgage-free home, and generous child maintenance to preserve stability.


They leave the partner, not the children.

They stop loving the ex — but never stop loving their kids.


But the other parent — wounded, angry, and obsessed with control — responds by weaponising the children. Not to protect them. But to punish.


This isn’t love.

This is retaliation.

And this is where financially motivated alienation begins.



Follow the Money: The Financial Patterns Behind Alienation


Family courts rarely scrutinise the financial backdrop of contact disputes. But if they did, a troubling pattern would emerge:-


  • Mortgage-free homes — funded by the ex-partner

  • Substantial divorce settlements securing long-term comfort

  • Generous child maintenance — often £400–£700+ per child, per month


And yet … contact is obstructed. Time with the other parent is minimised or denied. One parent slowly disappears from the child’s life.


Why?


Because for some alienating parents, it’s not just about emotional revenge.

It’s about financial control.

They retain the lifestyle of a two-parent household — without sharing the parenting.


This isn’t about protection. It’s about power, control, and profit.



Fixing the System: Start by Following the Money


One way to stop this abuse? Bring financial pattern analysis into alienation claims.


Courts should routinely review:-

  • The divorce and asset settlement (including Financial Orders)

  • Ongoing child maintenance

  • Contact patterns and obstructions


With this transparency, the Family Court would begin to see the difference between:-

  • A parent resisting contact to protect a child from harm, and

  • A parent withholding contact to punish an ex and retain financial benefits


Want to test the theory?

Halve maintenance when contact is unjustifiably denied.

Let’s see how many cases of “alienation” vanish once it stops being profitable.


Alienation should never be a punishment.

And child support should never be a reward for erasing a parent.



Memory Rewriting: The Psychological Toolkit of Alienating Parents


But financial gain is only one part of the story. Alienating parents often use covert psychological manipulation to rewrite the child’s memories and emotional bonds.


Over time, this creates:-

  • Distorted or repressed memories

  • Emotional detachment from a once-loved parent

  • Identity confusion


Children may come to believe in events that never happened — or forget moments filled with love, laughter, and security.


This isn’t just manipulation. It’s psychological abuse.



The Cost: Emotional and Developmental Harm


The impact on the child is devastating.


Children raised in alienating environments are far more likely to experience:-

  • Low self-esteem

  • Anxiety and depression

  • Guilt and internal conflict

  • Trust issues in adult relationships

  • Fragmented identity and emotional dysregulation

  • A distorted sense of entitlement — demanding, disrespectful, emotionally confused


Children forced to reject a loving parent are robbed of their emotional foundation.

They grow up without a stable internal compass. They may struggle in relationships, in work, and in understanding who they are.


Studies show children subjected to alienation are up to 40% more likely to experience anxiety disorders in adulthood.


The damage doesn’t end in childhood. It echoes across a lifetime.



Final Thoughts: Financial Gain Should Never Trump a Child’s Right to Love


The family court must start asking the right questions.


They must learn to distinguish between:-

  • Genuine protective parents accused of alienation

  • And alienating parents weaponising the system for emotional and financial gain


The key?


  • Follow the money

  • Scrutinise behaviours — not just statements

  • Protect the child — not the narrative



Conclusion: When the Family Court Gets It Wrong


Parental alienation — when driven by financial motives — is abuse.


It hijacks the child’s emotional reality. It rewrites history. It weaponises love.


But too often, the courts get it backwards:-

  • Protective parents are disbelieved and punished

  • Manipulators are rewarded and empowered


It’s time to connect the dots.


Follow the money.

Track the manipulation.

Protect the children.


Because alienation is real —

BUT it isn’t always coming from the parent the court thinks it is.


Deanna Newell Family Law

Advocacy for truth-tellers, survivors, and the children who deserve better

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page