Divorce Isn’t Just a Breakup , It’s a Financial Reckoning

---

Divorce settlements in England and Wales are meant to be fair. However fairness does not always mean a simple 50/50 split.

Behind every financial order are legal principles, financial realities, and often power imbalances that existed long before the divorce began.

When one partner controlled the money, ran the business, or prevented the other from working, the financial picture can be far more complicated than it appears.

Family courts decide financial settlements using the framework set out in Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, alongside key legal decisions that shape how fairness is interpreted.

Understanding how the system works can make the difference between a settlement that is fair and one that leaves someone financially vulnerable for years.

The Three Principles Judges Use in Divorce Settlements

The modern approach to financial settlements was clarified in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane (2006).

Courts consider three main principles; Needs. Sharing. Compensation.

Needs

The most important question is whether each person’s reasonable needs can be met after divorce.

Courts consider:-

• Housing

• Living expenses

• Childcare responsibilities

• Ability to earn income

• The standard of living during the marriage

If children primarily live with one parent, the court will prioritise stable housing and financial security for them.

That may mean one parent receives a larger share of the assets.

Sharing

The principle of equal sharing comes from White v White (2000), which confirmed that marriage is a financial partnership.

It means:-

• The breadwinner is not automatically entitled to more.

• Raising children and managing the household counts as an equal contribution.

• Assets built during the marriage are usually shared.

The starting point is often 50/50.

But it is only a starting point.

Compensation

Compensation recognises sacrificed opportunities.

If one spouse gave up a career, education, or earning potential to support the family or raise children, the court may award additional financial support.

This may include:-

• Larger capital settlements

• Spousal maintenance

The aim is to recognise the economic disadvantage created by the marriage itself.

Typical Divorce Settlements by Length of Marriage

The length of the marriage plays a significant role in how assets are divided.

While every case depends on individual circumstances, settlements often fall within these ranges:

Marriage Length	Typical Range
5 years	50/50 → 60/40
8 years	50/50 → 65/35
10 years	50/50 → 65/35 or sometimes 70/30 if one parent has primary care
15 years	Usually close to 50/50, but can be 60/40 depending on needs
20+ years	Often 50/50, sometimes 55/45 if one spouse has greater financial need

These are not fixed rules, however they illustrate how courts often approach fairness.

Why the Split Changes Over Time

The longer a marriage lasts, the more likely the court will treat it as a complete financial partnership.

Shorter Marriages (Under ~7 Years)

Courts may consider:-

• What each person brought into the marriage

• Whether assets existed before the marriage

• Limited sharing of pre-marital wealth

In short marriages, the court may try to restore each party closer to their original financial position.

Medium-Length Marriages (8–15 Years)

Courts usually treat:-

• Most assets built during the relationship as joint property

• Both partners’ roles,  earning and caregiving as equal contributions

At this stage, the sharing principle becomes stronger.

Long Marriages (15–20+ Years)

In longer marriages, courts typically view the relationship as a full economic partnership.

That usually means:-

• Assets are shared equally

• Pre-marital assets often become absorbed into marital property

• Pensions and businesses built during the marriage are divided

When Children Are Involved

Children often shift the financial balance.

If one parent is the main caregiver, the court may award:-

• A larger share of housing

• More capital to provide stability

• Longer-term spousal maintenance

The welfare of children is the first consideration under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.

A settlement that leaves children without secure housing is unlikely to be considered fair.

When One Spouse Did Not Work

Many marriages involve one partner stepping away from employment to support the family. This may involve:-

• Raising children

• Managing the household

• Supporting the other partner’s career or business

The court recognises these contributions as equal to earning money.

A spouse in this position may receive:-

• Half the marital assets

• Pension sharing

• Spousal maintenance

• Housing provision

Marriage is not only about who earned the money, but about how the family functioned.

When Financial Control Becomes Abuse

In some relationships, financial control goes far beyond normal household budgeting.

One partner may:-

• Control all bank accounts

• Prevent the other from working

• Restrict access to money

• Hide financial information

This behaviour can amount to economic abuse, recognised in the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. Courts may respond by ensuring the financially weaker spouse has:-

• Secure housing

• Adequate capital

• Time to rebuild their earning capacity

When a Business Is Involved

Businesses often complicate divorce settlements.

Even if the company is owned by one spouse, the court may still treat it as a marital asset, especially if it was built or expanded during the marriage.

A business is usually valued by financial experts.

Courts rarely force a sale because that could destroy the company and the income it produces. Instead, settlements often involve:-

• One spouse keeping the business

• The other receiving more property, savings, or pension assets

The aim is to divide the value, not necessarily the business itself.

How Controlling Spouses Hide Business Income

When one partner controls a company, the real income can be difficult to see.

Common tactics include:-

• Low salary with high dividends

Directors take minimal salary but withdraw income through dividends.

• Retained company profits

Money remains inside the business instead of being paid out.

• Director loan accounts

Funds are taken as “loans” rather than income.

• Personal expenses paid through the company

Cars, travel, insurance, and other benefits may be hidden in company accounts.

• Delayed contracts or payments

Income is postponed until after divorce proceedings.

Courts are aware these strategies exist — however they often rely heavily on full and honest financial disclosure.

What Happens If Someone Lies or Hides Assets

Divorce proceedings require both parties to disclose their finances honestly.

If someone hides assets or misleads the court, the consequences can be serious.

Judges may:-

• Order forensic financial investigations

• Draw negative conclusions from missing information

• Impose legal cost penalties

In extreme cases, a settlement can be overturned if dishonesty is later discovered.

The Supreme Court confirmed this in Sharland v Sharland (2015), where a divorce order was set aside after financial deception was uncovered.

The Five Biggest Financial Mistakes People Make in Divorce

Many unfair settlements happen because people make decisions without understanding the true financial picture.

The most common mistakes include:

• Accepting the first offer just to end the stress

Divorce is emotionally exhausting, but rushed settlements can overlook major assets.

• Ignoring pensions

Pensions are often one of the largest marital assets.

• Failing to value a business properly

Without expert valuation, businesses can be significantly undervalued.

• Accepting incomplete financial disclosure

Statements without evidence can hide substantial wealth.

• Focusing only on the family home

Property matters, but long-term financial security depends on income, pensions, and capital.

Divorce Should Not Leave Someone Powerless

Divorce is not simply the end of a relationship.

It is the division of a life that was built together.

Marriage is a partnership.

Childcare is work.

Running a home is work.

Supporting a partner’s career is work.

And when that partnership ends, fairness requires looking at the full financial reality,  not just the numbers one person chooses to reveal.

Understanding the law, the principles behind it, and the tactics sometimes used to manipulate finances is the first step toward ensuring that a divorce settlement reflects truth, fairness, and the future stability of everyone involved,  especially the children.

---

Deanna Newell Family Law

Advocacy for truth-tellers, survivors, and the children who deserve better