Child Maintenance Is Being Weaponised, And Children Are Paying the Price
- Deanna Newell
- Mar 19
- 4 min read

He can afford a BMW.
A Range Rover upgrade.
Luxury holidays.
But £300 to £1,000 a month for his child?
“That Is Too much.”
Let’s stop dressing it up.
That is not financial struggle.
That is coercive control.
This isn’t about money.
It never was.
It’s about power.
It’s about punishment.
It’s about maintaining control long after the relationship has ended.
And in the middle of it all, are children.
The Reality No One Wants to Say Out Loud
Some parents are not “struggling.”
They are choosing not to pay.
They:-
Delay payments deliberately
Hide or manipulate income
Exploit loopholes in the system
All while living comfortably
Sometimes even luxuriously.
Meanwhile, their child goes without the basics.
Not because the money isn’t there.
Because the willingness isn’t.
The Parents Who Actually Show Up
Let’s be clear, there is another side.
Parents who:-
Work two jobs
Skip meals
Go without essentials
Just to make sure that their child doesn’t have to.
They carry the full weight, financially, emotionally, physically.
while the other parent avoids responsibility.
And somehow, they’re expected to just “deal with it.”
The Enablers
This part makes people uncomfortable.
It should.
Because it’s not just the parent refusing to pay.
It’s the people around them.
The partner who benefits from the extra disposable income.
The family who knows exactly what’s going on.
The ones who stay silent because it’s easier.
If you are watching a child be pushed into poverty, and you saying nothing
You are not neutral.
You are complicit.
Abuse Masquerading as a Money Dispute
Let’s call this what it is.
This is not a disagreement.
This is not “one side vs the other.”
This is:-
Financial abuse
Post-separation abuse
Coercive control
Using money to punish an ex.
Using money to maintain power.
Using money to create stress, fear, and instability.
That is abuse, just in a form people are more willing to ignore.
When the System Fails
The system is not just flawed, it is being used.
Income is hidden.
Figures are manipulated.
Responsibility is avoided.
And the system often allows it.
Calculations based on surface-level income.
Loopholes for the self-employed.
No real reflection of lifestyle versus declared earnings.
So you end up with a parent who lives well
while officially appearing “unable to pay.”
And again—the child pays the price.
Revenge Disguised as Responsibility
In some cases, it cuts both ways.
Child maintenance is weaponised not just to avoid paying,
but to extract more.
Access to children is restricted.
Contact becomes conditional.
And it’s all used as leverage to demand more money.
These are often the same parents who have already received significant divorce settlements; mortgage-free homes, financial security and yet still, it isn’t enough.
Because this isn’t about need.
It’s about greed.
It’s about resentment.
It’s about punishing the other parent for leaving.
So they use what hurts most
the child.
They damage relationships.
They create distance.
They manipulate situations.
All to maintain control.
No regard for the child’s wellbeing.
No concern for the long-term harm.
Just selfishness, dressed up as justification.
This isn’t about fairness.
It’s about control.
And once again, the child becomes a bargaining chip
in an adult power struggle.
Systemic Issues That Enable Abuse
The system itself is part of the problem.
Maintenance is often calculated on top-line income, not real take-home pay.
Self-employed parents or business owners can manipulate what they “earn” on paper.
The result?
A parent can live well — while paying next to nothing.
Divorce settlements matter too.
If one parent walks away without assets, that reality must be reflected.
Creating a child is a shared responsibility.
Raising that child should be too.
Abuse Masquerading as Money
When maintenance is weaponised, it stops being about support.
It becomes about:-
Control
Revenge
Punishment
The result?
Children living with less.
Parents pushed to breaking point.
Stress, instability, and long-term harm.
All while the other parent carries on — unaffected.
This is financial abuse.
This is coercive control.
This is child neglect.
And it is happening every day.
It’s Time to Say It Clearly
Child maintenance is not:-
Optional
Negotiable
A tool for control
It is a legal and moral responsibility.
Two parents make a child.
Two parents are responsible for that child.
No loopholes.
No excuses.
No manipulation.
This Has to Change
We need a system that:-
Reflects real income and real lifestyle
Closes loopholes used to avoid responsibility
Recognises financial abuse as abuse
Holds both parents accountable
Because right now, the system is being played —
and children are losing.
Credit Where It’s Due
To the parents who show up every single day —
The ones who go without so their child doesn’t have to.
The ones who give more than required.
The ones who put their child’s wellbeing before everything else.
You are seen.
You are valued.
And you are appreciated.
You are what responsible parenting looks like.
The Bottom Line
If you can fund your lifestyle,
you can fund your child.
If you choose not to —
that is not hardship.
That is neglect.
That is control.
That is abuse.
And it’s time we stopped pretending otherwise.
Two parents make a child.
Two parents must share the cost.
Any parent who puts ego, greed, or revenge first isn’t parenting.
Anything less is abuse.
Deanna Newell Family Law
Advocacy for truth-tellers, survivors, and the children who deserve better


